David Lyle is a New York based artist whose paintings are
based on the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s. I
chose David Lyle’s artwork because he has a particular painting titled “Revenge
Is A Dish Best Served Cold” which shows a 60’s housewife with a blonde flip
hairstyle in the kitchen, preparing some kind of dessert or pastry. The irony
of this picture is that instead of using flour, there is a sack “rat and mouse
killer”.
I found this picture to be extremely relevant to my Women and
Film Studies class because it shows how throughout time, there have only been
two ways in which women are viewed. In the era of the 50’s, 60’s, and 70’s
especially, women were sorted into two different categories: hoe or housewife.
In “Ways of Seeing”, John Berger says, “men survey women before they
relate to them and the result of this measuring determine their relation to the
woman.”
In this time period, women
were immensely objectified in media as “this or the other”. I believe the inclusion
of the rodent poison is significant because it implies just how much women grew
to hate these stereotypes. You could be only either the Marilyn Monroe or
Audrey Hepburn but never a combination of both and there was definitely no
other alternative.
A lot of people like to think
that ideals like these are obsolete concepts that no longer exist in today’s
world. Notions like these are still very much prevalent. In the 50’s, 60’s, and
70’s however, there was very little opportunity for the female gender. We were
considered inferior to the man, being single or a single mother was frowned
upon since we were not meant to be the “bread winners” but rather the one’s who
cook, sow, and cater to their man in the bedroom.
Stereotypes like these
confined women to certain lifestyles for a very long time. Independent from the
growing film industry the Laura Murvey incessantly mentions in her analysis of
“Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”, I believe that women have always been
objectified and trivialized.
I don’t know who started the
trend of the domesticated lifestyle for woman, but I do know that inevitably
women were forced to adopt the trend and culture that came with it. A
competitive woman who sought a role beyond the home was scorned upon and considered
obnoxious. Examined more closely though, that kind of reaction from men was
likely because it was intimidating and castrating to the man.
What I mean by castrating is
that a woman that was anything short of obedient or homebound was automatically
considered the Marilyn Monroe. She was promiscuous, adventurous, independent,
all characteristics that were too innovative for that time. The “Marilyn
Monroe” type of woman was beautiful to look at and subsequently to fantasize
about. But she is the woman that you have an affair with, not the one you
propose to.
The ideal of a woman that can
be so free and independent in regards to a male companion was particularly
disquieting because it challenged the notion that men were superior, stronger
and smarter than women. It implied that all those qualities that once made a
man so desirable, would slowly begin to deteriorate when a woman acknowledges
that she too, can fend for herself.
Hence why men as a gender
have always objectified women throughout history. You can be the woman on the
centerfold or the housewife but you were definitely one or the other.
Regardless of which one you were, your purpose still lied in pleasing a man
whether it meant sexually or domestically.
The Marilyn Monroe’s of that
time were not in fact whore’s or ho’s, however. But since they pursued and
embodied such a drastic change from the “housewife”, they were not considered
ideal mates and for that reason they invited more perverse and remote thoughts.
The Marilyn Monroe’s sought to embrace their sexuality rather than conceal it,
which in turn made them the “one night stand” kind of woman. That kind of
thinking is very similar to the philosophy that you “attract what you put out”.
I strongly believe that the
Marilyn Monroe’s of this time were not striving to be strictly sexual but
instead dignified, feminine and prideful in their anatomy and sensuality. They
pioneered to break free from the chains of small-mindedness that all women
should be subservient, conservative and inferior. By no surprise however, they
were seen by men in a way that implied “I am the black sheep and as such I am
here to provide to you the sexual favors that your old-fashioned, archaic consort
refuses to perform”.
No comments:
Post a Comment